Categories
Previous Articles
Latest Views
- F1 champion Sebastian Vettel misses the point with Social Media
The motorsport world has gradually started to shake off the festive cobwebs as January continues to get the new calendar year underway with a number of high profile events taking place this week.
- Social Media and London 2012
We submitted a short blog for The UK Sports Network this week with some social media predictions for 2012. Being Olympics year, and with a number of athletes on the Sine Qua Non books, including Zac Purchase and Paralympic athletes Charlotte Henshaw and Ollie Hynd, we looked at how the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games will be the first true social media summer Games.
RT @InsideFerrari: Ferrari and Santander together until 2017 http://t.co/iGjflr3D #F1 #Sponsorship
Interesting to see how #London2012 sponsors use athletes - past and present - in activation and engagement #cisdcampbell
Apple does it again
Business | Sponsorship | Technology
Well that is another solid quarter from Apple to say the least. Profits and revenue were up 50% and 31% respectively over a year ago while growing gross margin 3 points to 40.9 at the same time. They sold 33% more Mac computers in the quarter, 100% more iPhones and 21 million iPods which was an 8% drop. And tomorrow they are launching “a major new product” that they are “very excited about”, widely believed to be the iPad or iTablet or iSlate or whatever they call it, which is likely to boost figures even further.
So let’s look at this success from a marketing perspective and compare it with another giant of marketing, Red Bull. Apple has always focussed on being a “cool” technology company and to a large extent has let the products do the talking. Just as we are seeing with tomorrows launch much of their marketing is based on anticipation as a result of controlled and limited release of information. If you think about it control is a word that will keep cropping up whether in a marketing or proprietary technology sense. Once the products are out advertising has always been the communications vehicle of choice ever since the 1980’s. The business has always avoided sponsorship which probably harks back to the control thing again. There are some confident egos at play and sponsorship generally puts the brand into an uncontrolled or potentially diluted environment. Advertising though very one dimensional is, within the bounds of trade standards legislation, a totally controlled message.
That has not hindered Red Bull. They have combated any possibility of dilution head on with blanketed coverage across every sponsorship category. Neither brand suffers from a lack of awareness. One could argue that Red Bull have less, or in fact nothing to spend on product development unlike the R&D efforts at Apple. Perhaps Apple can’t find a sponsorship opportunity with the right attributes to match its wide audience. But perhaps they just haven’t realised that preference is more than just cool products and confident advertising. Sponsorship is a tool that if used properly can support all the Apple values and attributes and maintain growth in shareholder returns.
Trackback URL for this post:
Trackbacks are disabled for this entry
Comments
There are no comments on this article yet.
Comment on this Article >